In Defence of The Big Four
While commenting on the Worst Poirot Novel topic, it struck me that lots of people don't like The Big Four much. Yet is one of my favourites. I am all too aware of its faults - it really does read like a series of short stories which have been rather desperately threaded together, which of course is what it is. Yet I find it genuinely thrilling. There is a sense of danger throughout for me and at times it makes me feel sad, other times makes me smile. I reread it a lot and have listened to the audiobook several times.
I don't want to say much more at the moment. I am new here, and not entirely sure of what is acceptable to reveal about a book's plot. But I wondered if there is anyone else out there who likes The Big Four?
Comments
SPOILERS! - I especially liked the part where Poirot invented a brother named Achille - ah the irony - as part of his grand plan. I thought it was ingenious.
When completing the book, instantly the The Big Four moved drastically up into the top 3 of my imaginary list of favourite books that I have read since my birth some considerable years ago. And believe me I have read a wide variety of books both old and new. This is my favourite book that Agatha Christie has written in my opinion.
"Why is The Big Four his favourite book?" I hear you ask, well then I shall answer.
Any book that is very fast past I instantly like, the saying "Life is too short" often forces itself into my head at infrequent times and I often want to read short novels or short stories.
I love a book which used unlikely characters in a genre, The Big Four is a thriller, Poirot and Hastings are not really thriller kind-of-characters. (I do not even think I have read any sentence where it says "and Poirot ran"
Lastly for a fast past book which is not very long, it included quite a lot of stuff. SPOILERS: Exploding mountains, a twin brother, kidnapping, crime lords, undergrounds lairs, man coming through a window then dying and a lot of crime scenes.